We Have Just Come Down from the Trees II

One of my favorite movies is now a classic “2001: A Space Odyssey” directed by the great Stanley Kubrick. Aside from a truly visual feast that it is, the movie treats the audience to a most fascinating examination of the ephemeral nature of life. Considering how eons long it took for the solar system to materialize, and then how long after that it took for earth’s carbon to yield the first colony of protozoa, and then for evolution to yield intelligence, it is indeed less than a second ago that man inhabited the earth. We have just come down from the trees.

Now earth’s perfect animal (man) has discovered how to control evolution itself. Evolution is no longer a phenomenon of mostly chance: the slow process of evolution guided only by a simple but ruthless rule, the survival of the fittest, and time measured in millions of years, is no more. Man now has the capability to chart the course of humankind. We can recreate ourselves to become super human beings, or with just the same amount of ability and probability, destroy ourselves.

This is my second blog on this topic, and the question still is: “Which way will we go? The way to a life we can only imagine and wonder, or the way to extinction?” Our path is fraught with danger, but by nature we are optimistic. And so we move forward, aware of the dangers, but always moving forward — at a faster and faster pace.

Less than a decade ago somebody invented the phrase “knowledge workers”.  He predicted that, on average, people’s salaries will be in direct proportion to the number of years spent in school or self-study. Now that has come to pass, not only in economically advanced countries, but in previously poor countries as well. Today millions of knowledge workers in India and China benefit from the high demand for knowledge workers worldwide.

But progress measured in millions of years now happen every month, even every day. Technology is changing our lives, not just in a linear, upward trend, but exponentially. The only prediction we can make is the exponential nature of the change from here on. It will be a wonderful life, if only we don’t destroy ourselves.

I want to introduce a new phrase: “Ideas Per Minute”.

Every minute, there must be millions of people around the world who come up with bright ideas. Whereas the output of knowledge workers are best harnessed for society by businesses organized for profit, the output of millions of people with a million ideas are best harnessed by 1) making such ideas known to all, and in order to incentivize such spread of knowledge, 2) protecting the most profitable ideas by a system of patents. Not too long from now, I think “Ideas Per Minute” will be a significant economic measure. In addition to GDP, I think Ideas Per Minute (IPM) can add to the insight into how a country is more advanced than another. Studies will be made on how a country’s measure of freedom affects IPM.

For-profit companies organized for the sole purpose of accumulating ideas (patents) are now in existence. Not surprisingly, the country with one of the highest IPM, the U.S.A., is leading in this kind of business. It was not too long ago that Nathan Mhyrvold (a former Microsoft technology leader) formed a company called Intellectual Ventures with the objective of accumulating ideas for profit. Now an offshoot has sprouted in California: Rational Patents. There will be more, and it won’t be long until this trickle becomes a raging river. If you have bright ideas, I urge you to take a look at these two companies. It can put your own life on an exponential trajectory.

Advertisements

About ctapang

I am a Software Design Engineer. I have just abandoned the huge army organized to make .Net programming the one dominant programming system. I now program in Typescript which (surprise) is also from Microsoft. Aside from my day job as a programmer, I am also involved in a movement (http://correctphilippines.org) to correct the Philippine constitution. It's an ambitious undertaking in itself, and there's no guarantee that improving our constitution will improve things. However, one thing is certain: if we don't establish a rational constitution, we will continue on our path of self-destruction. What kind of government is best? For me the best government is that which governs the least. We need the government not because it can provide for us but because it keeps us from running into each other. The proper function of government is that of a traffic light: it prevents us from bumping each other, but it does not tell us where to go.
This entry was posted in Amateur Philosophy. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s